LRWC calls out potential breach of international law in U of T staff recruitment process

Verbal agreement to hire program director allegedly rescinded due to external pressure

LRWC calls out potential breach of international law in U of T staff recruitment process
University of Toronto

Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada has suggested that an independent review be conducted regarding the alleged rescission of a verbal agreement to hire a director for the University of Toronto Faculty of Law’s International Human Rights Program.

A letter dated Sept. 30 written by Catherine Morris, executive director at LRWC, and addressed to Edward Iacobucci, dean of the law school, urged the university to acquire an external investigator for the review and to make the investigator’s findings public.

The matter relates to allegations that the university rescinded the hiring committee’s agreement to recruit Dr. Valentina Azarova, an international human rights scholar, for which a verbal offer and acceptance were made and for which implementing steps were taken by both the university and by Azarova.

Allegedly, the university decided to rescind the arrangement when a sitting judge of the Tax Court of Canada, who is a donor to the university, raised the issue of Azarova’s research about international human rights and international humanitarian law in connection with Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories. Justice David Spiro is reportedly facing complaints filed with the Canadian Judicial Council, the letter stated.

LRWC cited potential violations of international law if these allegations are found to be true, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Articles 10, 11 and 18 of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders; and Articles 16 and 23 of the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers.

The UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers state that legal practitioners have the right to freedom of expression, belief, association, assembly and participation in the public discussion of matters relating to the law, the administration of justice and human rights. These principles also state that lawyers should be able to freely carry out their advocacy without being intimidated, hindered or harassed.

“The legal profession and legal academic communities have an important role to play in ensuring respect for international human rights law and international humanitarian law,” wrote Morris in the letter. “Unpopularity of the implications of international law within some sectors of society is an illegitimate reason for failure to uphold it.”

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

After removing exemption, LSO votes down motion to reduce annual fees for retired lawyers over 65

Pilot explores how social work students can help fill funding gaps in community legal clinics

Lawyer suspended, allegedly mishandled and misappropriated trust funds, lied to LSO

COVID-19 and the holidays: Personal injury firms fundraising for frontline healthcare workers

Law Society passes fee reduction, COVID-19 relief, some Benchers say measures fall short

New differential privacy algorithm allows for secure sharing of machine-learning legal tech: lawyer

Most Read Articles

Legal profession must ensure inclusion for lawyers with mental health and addiction issues: lawyer

New differential privacy algorithm allows for secure sharing of machine-learning legal tech: lawyer

Ontario Review Board cannot order accused to attend Zoom hearing: Court

Superior Court asked to clarify effect of revocation of temporary suspension of limitation periods