Ontario Superior Court upholds eviction order against tenant after landlords sold the property

The property contained no more than three units, a key condition to terminate the tenancy

Ontario Superior Court upholds eviction order against tenant after landlords sold the property

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has upheld an eviction order against a tenant following the landlords’ decision to sell the property.

Tenant Dana Turner sought to overturn a Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) ruling that terminated her tenancy. The case involved an application by landlords Gordon Dong and Kantilal Chunilal Modi, who had sold the property and required the rental unit for the purchaser’s personal residential use.

The LTB initially granted the landlords' application under s. 49 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, which allows landlords to terminate a tenancy if a purchaser in good faith requires the unit for residential occupation. Turner disputed the LTB’s finding that the residential complex contained no more than three units, a key condition for such an application under the act. She claimed the property, a side-split house, included four self-contained residential units. However, the LTB found otherwise, determining that there was only one rental unit with a single tenant—Turner herself. Despite the presence of other occupants, the board ruled that there were no valid subtenancies, as Turner had not vacated the unit, which is required for a sublet under the act.

The LTB's decision to proceed without granting Turner’s request for an adjournment further became a point of contention. Turner had sought an adjournment to better prepare for the hearing, believing she would win on the preliminary issue regarding the number of units. The LTB denied this request, concluding that Turner had sufficient time to prepare, as she had received the notice of the landlords' application in September 2022.

On appeal, Turner argued that the LTB erred in its ruling and that she was denied procedural fairness, particularly in the board’s refusal to allow a "video walkthrough" of the property to demonstrate the number of units. The Superior Court rejected these claims, noting that the LTB's decision was based on the zoning restrictions, which limited the property to a single dwelling, and the evidence provided by both parties. The court found no legal error in the LTB’s decision and determined that procedural fairness was maintained throughout the proceedings.

The court dismissed Turner’s appeal to introduce new evidence, such as tenancy agreements and photographs. The court ruled that this evidence could have been presented at the LTB hearing and would not have affected the outcome.

As a result, the eviction order remained in place, and the court denied Turner’s request for a stay of the eviction.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Ontario Superior Court refuses to set aside settlement in car crash case involving fraudulent lawyer

Ontario Superior Court removes sibling as estate trustee amid conflict and mismanagement concerns

Lenczner Slaght's Susannah Alleyne talks new inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility role

Ontario court deducts COVID-19 income benefits from past income loss award in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results

Ontario Superior Court upholds cell phone search as lawful and rejects bid to exclude evidence

Most Read Articles

Ontario court deducts COVID-19 income benefits from past income loss award in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results

Lenczner Slaght's Susannah Alleyne talks new inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility role

Ontario Superior Court refuses to set aside settlement in car crash case involving fraudulent lawyer