Proposed Business Corporations Act changes likely to attract foreign investment, says lawyer

Rule change would put Ontario in line with several other provinces

Proposed Business Corporations Act changes likely to attract foreign investment, says lawyer
Ian Michael, partner at Bennett Jones LLP.

The Ontario Government’s proposed amendments to the Business Corporations Act would likely increase the number of new corporations being created in Ontario, says Ian Michael, partner at Bennett Jones LLP, who practises corporate and securities law.

The suggested amendments are contained within Bill 213: Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020, which is currently in second reading.

If passed, the legislation would remove the Canadian residency requirements for corporation directors. Currently, at least 25 per cent of an Ontario corporation’s directors must be resident Canadians. Quebec, B.C., Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have already nixed this requirement and Alberta is in the process of doing so.

The change will be welcomed by foreign investors with their eyes on the Ontario economy, says Michael.

“I think we will see an increase in the number of new Ontario corporations being created. Given the size of Ontario's economy within Canada, a lot of foreign investment comes to Ontario,” he says.

As the law currently stands, when an investor creates a new company as a base for its investment and lacks a Canadian resident to appoint as a director, the residency requirement leads them to incorporate elsewhere, even if the business is in Ontario and the investors have other companies in the province, Michael says.

The requirement is also artificial as it cannot prevent foreign actors from directing an Ontario corporation’s meaningful decision-making, he adds. Under the Ontario Business and Corporations Act, the shareholders can take decision-making power away from the company’s board and give it to themselves through a unanimous declaration.

“If you are a foreign company holding an Ontario Corporation and you have a local Canadian resident director, you can bypass the role that Canadian resident has by simply having the shareholders reserve the decision-making powers to the foreign shareholders and therefore neutralizing the effect of having a Canadian on the board,” Michael says.

In taking that power, the shareholders would thereby take on liability for their decisions and so the action would not be taken lightly, he adds.

Bill 213 also proposes to permit public corporations to pass ordinary resolutions in writing with majority shareholder approval. The law currently asks for unanimous shareholder approval.

But a majority of shareholders can call a meeting, where that majority can then pass the resolution. Requiring unanimity to streamline that process with a written resolution – especially amid COVID-19 – is an “administrative hassle” and “legally meaningless,” says Michael.

“It's forcing a process without any impact on the ultimate result, most of the time,” he says.

Requiring written resolutions to be unanimous is difficult for those with many shareholders or shareholders who are uncooperative or inattentive, says Michael. The COVID-19 pandemic has also made it hard to justify otherwise unnecessary meetings.

There are certain situations, where contentious issues are being dealt with and holding a meeting to allow shareholders to express their opinion – despite their being in the minority – is a good thing for shareholder engagement, says Michael.

“Where there are controversial decisions to be made that might benefit from debate amongst the shareholders, that gets bypassed in this arrangement,” he says.

But for routine decisions, Bill 213’s proposed change is an “administrative efficiency,” he says.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society of Ontario seeking input from profession on regulatory approaches to licensee competence

Ontario seeking input on provincial privacy law, lawyers say Canada’s privacy regime needs update

Toufic Adlouni’s law firm began as a side hustle, and he encourages his team to dream big too

Groups share submissions to consultation for proposed Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Framework

Court awards costs of $325,000 on a substantial indemnity basis in estate case

Finding accused fabricated testimony requires independent supporting evidence: Court of Appeal

Most Read Articles

Osgoode admin, Jewish and Muslim students’ associations issue statement on Israel and Palestine

Human rights sacrificed for security in federal prisons, stronger oversight needed: Senate report

Certain businesses to require customer proof of vaccination to guard against liability: lawyer

Court awards costs of $325,000 on a substantial indemnity basis in estate case