Trial judge may not express opinion that will influence jury on verdict

Supreme court | Trial

CHARGE TO JURY

Trial judge may not express opinion that will influence jury on verdict

Accused’s conviction for second degree murder set aside and new trial ordered. Trial judge may express opinion on question of fact when warranted so long as circumstances permit but judge may not express opinion that will influence jury on verdict. Trial judge committed error by failing to simply outline defence theory, instead attempting to demonstrate its implausibility and by failing to repeat caution regarding own opinion. Summary of defence theory should be presented objectively.
R. c. Mailhot (Mar. 28, 2013, S.C.C., McLachlin C.J.C., LeBel J., Fish J., Abella J., Rothstein J., Moldaver J., and Wagner J., File No. 34881) 108 W.C.B. (2d) 407.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala