Rule or policy unilaterally imposed must be consistent with collective agreement

Supreme court | Administrative Law

JUDICIAL REVIEW

Rule or policy unilaterally imposed must be consistent with collective agreement

Irving Pulp & Paper, which operated paper mill, unilaterally adopted workplace policy which included mandatory and random alcohol testing for employees holding safety sensitive positions. Computer selected names of employees randomly. Union filed policy grievance challenging “without cause” aspect of policy. Majority of arbitration board concluded mill operation, while constituting dangerous work environment, did not fall within ultra-dangerous category. Majority, considering absence of evidence relating to alcohol use in workplace, found that Irving Pulp & Paper failed to establish need for policy by demonstrating mill operations posed sufficient risk of harm that outweighed employees’ right to privacy. Application judge allowed application for judicial review, finding it unreasonable to require evidence of pre-existing alcohol problem once majority concluded mill represented dangerous workplace. Union’s appeal dismissed but further appeal allowed. Employers in unionized workplace not permitted to “promulgate unreasonable rules and then punish employees who infringe them”. Employers may discharge or discipline employees only for just cause or reasonable cause. Any rule or policy unilaterally imposed by employer must be consistent with collective agreement and be reasonable.
Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. CEP, Local 30 (Jun. 14, 2013, S.C.C., McLachlin C.J.C., LeBel J., Fish J., Abella J., Rothstein J., Cromwell J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., and Wagner J., File No. 34473) Decision at 216 A.C.W.S. (3d) 2 was reversed.  228 A.C.W.S. (3d) 5.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Housing supply needs more public-private collaboration, less red tape, say lawyers

Judicial vacancies holding up construction litigation: litigators

With new federal funding Pro Bono Ontario expanding program for Ukrainian nationals across Canada

Ontario Court of Appeal resolves access rights between parents and maternal grandparents

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds dismissal of statute-barred personal injury claim

Ontario Superior Court rules on admissibility of jury questions in vehicle accident case

Most Read Articles

Ontario Court of Appeal resolves access rights between parents and maternal grandparents

Judicial vacancies holding up construction litigation: litigators

With new federal funding Pro Bono Ontario expanding program for Ukrainian nationals across Canada

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds dismissal of statute-barred personal injury claim