Specific deterrence was factor in case as accused needed lesson on evils of drinking and driving

Ontario criminal | Criminal Law | Sentencing by offence | Offences against the person and reputation |

Accused failed to stop at red light and struck car that was attempting to turn on green light, causing serious injuries to both passengers in other car. Accused pleaded guilty to two counts of impaired operation of motor vehicle causing bodily harm. Crown and defence made submissions on sentencing. Accused was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment with ten-year driving prohibition. In addition to denunciation and general deterrence, specific deterrence was factor in case as accused needed lesson on evils of drinking and driving. Aggravating factors included accused’s terrible driving, number of victims and devastation of injuries, degree of drunkenness, and lack of acceptance of responsibility. Mitigating factors were guilty pleas and fact that accused sought some counselling and abstained from consumption of alcohol since offence date.

R. v. Theriault (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 21592, 2018 ONSC 7465, Conlan J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.

 

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Mariam Moktar elected second vice-president of the Ontario Bar Association

Ontario Superior Court grants plaintiff's motion to add new defendant in slip and fall case

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses First Nations' appeal over environmental regulation changes

LSO bencher Murray Klippenstein given "substantial indemnity" costs in suit against legal regulator

Most Read Articles

LSO bencher Murray Klippenstein given "substantial indemnity" costs in suit against legal regulator

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Ontario Superior Court finds plaintiff contributorily negligent in slip and fall case

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings