Federal government to clarify shared parenting benefits eligibility

Amendment seeks to correct disparity between executive’s and judiciary’s definitions of shared parenting

Federal government to clarify shared parenting benefits eligibility
Bill Morneau

Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced on Aug. 29 that the federal government plans to amend the Income Tax Act to clarify eligibility for shared parenting benefits.

The legislative proposal comes after several recent Federal Court of Appeal decisions that, according to a statement by the Department of Finance, applied a narrower interpretation of shared parenting.

In the court’s definition, shared parenting is when a child resides with the parent between 45 per cent and 55 per cent of the time.  Since 2011, the Canada Revenue Agency has determined who qualifies, based on an interpretation of shared parenting as meaning that a child generally lives with the parent between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of the time — wider than the definition applied by the court.

These benefits are under Canada Child Benefit, which was introduced in 2016 to provide low- and middle-income families with tax-free money to assist in raising children, with around $24 billion paid out annually. The benefits can be split among parents who share parenting time for a child.

According to Morneau, the clarification to the Income Tax Act will ensure that benefits paid to families in shared-parenting arrangements are not stopped or interrupted.

“This money makes a huge difference in the lives of children,” Morneau said. “To make sure all parents who qualify continue to receive this support, our government intends to clarify the legislation."

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Ford government’s cuts to Toronto city council ruled constitutional

Histories of Canadian law and Métis people are entwined, says Jean Teillet

More women are on TSX company boards - but there’s slow progress to the C-Suite, says Osler

GM lawyer Michael Smith becomes partner at Bennett Jones

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

House of Commons reveals legal fee reimbursement over $54k

Most Read Articles

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

Man discharged from his fourth bankruptcy

Insurance lawyers reveal their referral philosophies

Court of Appeal rules auto insurer not liable for parental negligence claim stemming from accident