Judge warns against ‘outrageous’ costs demands amid COVID constraints

“In the wake of the Covid-19 epidemic, court resources are severely strained”

Judge warns against ‘outrageous’ costs demands amid COVID constraints

A short but emphatic decision from Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice says that lawyers must “resolve as many issues as reasonably possible, including costs,” as the COVID-19 pandemic slackens the pace of the justice system.

In the April 23 costs endorsement, Justice Deena Baltman awarded applicant Clifford Booth fixed, inclusive costs of $3,000 — in line with the proposal of respondent Michelle Yvette Marie Bilek. 

While Bilek’s lawyer, Carolyn Chambers, had proposed the $3,000 sum, Booth’s lawyer, Shawn Philbert, sought $8,615.60. Philbert had also offered to settle for $10,000.

Baltman bashed Philbert’s bill as “highly unreasonable,” calling it an insincere attempt to resolve costs, despite her previous instructions to “make every effort [emphasis in original] to resolve costs of this motion.”

“Counsel must know that in the wake of the Covid-19 epidemic, court resources are severely strained. That is why, more than ever, we expect counsel to resolve as many issues as reasonably possible, including costs,” wrote Baltman, writing with emphasis: 

“Outrageous cost demands which predictably will require further adjudication by the court completely frustrate that objective, and must be discouraged.” 

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Muslim lawyer Walied Soliman wins $500,000 damages in libel lawsuit for terrorism accusations

Accepting contractual terms after choosing not to read its conditions is legally binding: Ont CA

Women accused of racist Snapchat video, mocking George Floyd, win defamation suit

Financial disclosure still required in summary judgment motions: court

Owner or contractor? Court rules on litigant's status under Construction Act

Court finds that successive warrant applications on the same information not an abuse of process

Most Read Articles

Ontario's new online gaming application has several complex considerations: Stikeman Elliott

Lenczner Slaght expands ReferToHer to include more female lawyers with aim to improve diversity

Women accused of racist Snapchat video, mocking George Floyd, win defamation suit

Court refuses to exclude evidence gathered in execution of search warrant covering applicant's home