Competition bureau to give lawyers more warning on deal reviews

Boswell talks to ABA members

Competition bureau to give lawyers more warning on deal reviews
Rob Kwinter

Federal Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell told lawyers last week that officials will be giving parties earlier and more transparent feedback on mergers, according to Rob Kwinter, partner at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP’s competition group in Toronto.

Kwinter interviewed Boswell for the American Bar Association’s antitrust law section on July 10. Kwinter says that as a practising lawyer, he thought Boswell’s openness to greater transparency was particularly significant.

“In very complex mergers, it would be helpful if the bureau could provide earlier and more detailed thinking,” says Kwinter. “It seems like he thinks that would be a good idea and I look forward to that.”

Boswell told Kwinter that the bureau will also be looking more deeply at efficiencies defence and privilege claims.

“They want to look more closely at an operational level on how that defence operates. They will have larger information demands than in the past,” says Kwinter. “[Privelege claims have] been an issue that has arisen in the context of cartel investigations. It really asks the question: To what extent does the usual protection of communications between a client and their lawyer have to give way to an investigation? The bureau is concerned privilege claims may inhibit their ability to get the information to pursue a case, and by the same token, lawyers want their communications with clients to be kept private. They want to make the process more efficient, and I assume ultimately more fair. But in appropriate cases, the commissioner will seek court intervention.”

Kwinter says that Boswell’s comments are particularly interesting in the context of the digital economy. Increased enforcement when it comes to software mergers have caught the attention of business clients, says Kwinter.

“The digital economy is a buzzword that people are interested in, obviously, and he made it clear they are committed to enforcement,” he says.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Invoking notwithstanding clause, Ford Government passes amendments to Election Finances Act

International lawyer and professor Payam Akhavan wins Law Society’s 2021 Human Rights Award

New national study will evaluate well-being in legal profession

Taxi company’s insurer not liable for accident victim’s statutory accident benefits

Human Rights Tribunal extended protected ground of citizenship to include permanent residency: Court

Second ruling on whether a COVID-related layoff is constructive dismissal produces opposite result

Most Read Articles

Second ruling on whether a COVID-related layoff is constructive dismissal produces opposite result

Ontario Court of Appeal split over sobriety check of driver which occurred on private driveway

Human rights commission urges province’s justice sector to keep prison population low amid COVID-19

Queen’s Law professor Cherie Metcalf receives grants for climate change research