Scathing ruling prompts law firm to split

A Toronto litigation boutique that was the subject of a scathing Superior Court ruling has folded.

Gardner Hodder says the ruling, which harshly criticized his former partner, prompted him to permanently end his association with Eric Polten and terminate Polten & Hodder.

“There is some obvious personal pain in having my name attached to a judgment like that,” Hodder says.
In Miksche Estate v. Miksche, Justice David Brown ruled Polten attempted a “naked cash grab” against two elderly women, who were both former clients.

Polten ran up a “scandalous” million-dollar legal tab that exceeded the value of the estate and that he tried to recover from two vulnerable clients, Brown said in the decision.

The judge criticized Polten for what he called professional misconduct and breach of professional duties.
Hodder wouldn’t comment on the ruling itself. “The decision speaks for itself. Justice Brown is a well-respected judge,” he says.

He adds that he represented the business-law arm of the firm and had no involvement in the case.
Effective last Wednesday, he moved to continue his practice as Hodder Barristers. According to the firm’s web site, Polten will continue a civil litigation practice as Polten & Associates.

“I’m hopeful this is something that is not going to affect my practice adversely,” Hodder says.

To get the full story from last week, click here.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Court of Appeal overturns convictions finding Crown breached accused’s confidential informant status

Federation of Ontario Law Associations urges federal government to address judicial vacancy crisis

Ontario Superior Court upholds BMW's right to redact documents in class action lawsuit

Appeal court confirms doctors liable in medical malpractice case concerning law of informed consent

Queen’s Taylor Swift course 'Law (Taylor’s Version)' uses singer as entertainment law case study

Ontario Superior Court varies parenting order to ensure child's school attendance

Most Read Articles

Appeal court confirms doctors liable in medical malpractice case concerning law of informed consent

Queen’s Taylor Swift course 'Law (Taylor’s Version)' uses singer as entertainment law case study

Court of Appeal overturns convictions finding Crown breached accused’s confidential informant status

Ontario Superior Court upholds BMW's right to redact documents in class action lawsuit