There was insufficient evidence to reasonably support finding confirming that donation were made

Tax – Income Tax – Administration and enforcement

Taxpayer was religious leader of recognized chapel. Taxpayer’s claimed charitable deductions in amounts of $3,550, $9,120, and $6,346 for his 2005, 2006 and 2007 taxation years respectively were denied. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Three documents identified as donation receipts were put in evidence for subject donation amounts and each was signed by taxpayer in his capacity as religious leader. No corroborating evidence such as bank account or church records were submitted in evidence nor were any other chapel officials called to testify. Section 230(4) of Income Tax Act provides that books and records are to be kept for at least six years and s. 230(6) requires such books and records be kept until expiration of any objection or appeal including expiration of time for appeal or further appeal of any such objection or appeal. Corroborating books and records were reasonably required in this case, particularly insofar sole signatory of receipts presented was taxpayer himself. It was not found that claimed donations were not made. It was simply found that insufficient evidence of nature contemplated by s. 230(6) and in any event on general common sense basis was presented to reasonably support finding confirming on balance of probabilities that subject donations were made.

Ampratwum-Duah v. The Queen (2020), 2020 CarswellNat 184, 2020 TCC 18, B. Russell J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure