Taxpayer was not party to franchise agreement and therefore had no rights or entitlements under it

Tax - Income tax - Capital gains and losses

Taxpayer owned restaurant and years later, restaurant was renamed following amalgamation of several corporations, including taxpayer. Franchise agreements for these restaurants were with SFI Inc., and SFI Inc. entered into ten-year franchise agreement with A Ltd.. A Ltd. was not able to fund costs and expenses under franchise agreement and took out two large loans. Terms and conditions of second loan were set out in letter of offer and accepted by franchise holding corporation. “Borrower” of second loan included taxpayer, and security agreement and debenture in favour of taxpayer and others was executed. Shortly after agreements were made, bankruptcy order was issued against A Ltd.. Taxpayer was reassessed by Minister and denied allowable business investment loss (ABIL) as well as carry-back and carry-forward of non-capital loss resulting from ABIL. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Taxpayer was not party to franchise agreement and therefore had no rights or entitlements under franchise agreement. Bankruptcy of A Ltd. did not in and of itself create indebtedness owed to taxpayer by A Ltd., as no amount in respect of principal amount of second loan would be included in indebtedness until payment was made by creditor to bank in respect of principal amount. Unfortunately for taxpayer, evidence was that taxpayer had paid no amount in respect of principal amount of second loan to bank or any other person for benefit of A Ltd.. Under letter of offer, obligation of taxpayer with respect to principal amount of second loan was obligation of taxpayer to bank and did not constitute cost of debt owed by A Ltd. to taxpayer. Accordingly, appeal was dismissed.

Moose Factory Restaurant Properties Ltd. v. The Queen (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 3715, 2019 TCC 156, John R. Owen J. (T.C.C. [General Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Criminal lawyers wary of sharing contact tracing with law enforcement

LSO should pay $46K to lawyer, tribunal says

Tribunal finds that spilling tea while stopped at a red light is not an automobile accident

Workplace safety tribunal shares best practices for teleconference hearings

Law foundation approves grants for investor rights projects of UToronto Law, Osgoode and others

Ontario Bar Association hosts free online information sessions on elder law for Seniors’ Month

Most Read Articles

List of resources for lawyers on how to be an ally to racialized colleagues

LSO should pay $46K to lawyer, tribunal says

Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to host mental health webinar

Criminal lawyers wary of sharing contact tracing with law enforcement