Distributions not needing legal character of death benefits to be classified as such for tax purposes

Tax court of Canada | Tax | Income tax | Administration and enforcement

Taxpayers E, K, M and S were all in receipt of benefits payable under former pension plan of N Corp. which became insolvent and received payments from trust set up by N Corp. to cover health and welfare claims. E and K had insurance benefits and M and S death benefits. Taxpayers filed their income tax returns for 2011 on basis that distributions were income but later filed Notices of Objection taking position that distributions were not taxable. Assessments were confirmed and taxpayers appealed. Minister sought to introduce affidavit with copies of 2011 T3 return filed by trust and 2011 Trust Notice of Assessment issued to trust. Appeals allowed for E and K; appeal allowed in part for M; appeal dismissed for S. Affidavit inadmissible under general exclusion under s.89(1) of Income Tax Rules. No indication that Minister used T3 return in assessing taxpayers. Trust not given notice of intention to introduce trust’s confidential taxpayer information as evidence. Trust provisions of Income Tax Act (ITA) not determinative of appeals. As specific provisions did not capture distributions paid in 2011 by trust to E and K, s.6(1)(a) of ITA could not be used to fill in the gaps left by subsection 6(4) and Part XXVII or to sweep distributions into incomeGiven that orders provided that interim distributions were to be made “on account of” Income Benefits distributions came within s.56(1)(a)(iii) of ITA, as amount received on account of death benefit. Amounts of distributions to S and M calculated on understanding that amounts would partially replace, or be in lieu of, death benefits that would have been paid. Distributions did not need to have legal character of death benefits in order to come within s.56(1)(a)(iii) of ITA. Assessment of M referred back to Minister on basis that amount of 2011 distribution to be included in computing her income for 2011 was $6,152.42 and not $6,438.39.

Scott v. The Queen (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 6488, 2017 TCC 224, Don R. Sommerfeldt J. (T.C.C. [General Procedure]).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Lenczner Slaght's Susannah Alleyne talks new inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility role

Ontario court deducts COVID-19 income benefits from past income loss award in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results

Ontario Superior Court upholds cell phone search as lawful and rejects bid to exclude evidence

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Most Read Articles

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Jury award in motorcycle crash lawsuit surpasses defendant's final offer: Ontario Superior Court

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results