By presenting substantive arguments in motion to dismiss, resident submitted to court’s jurisdiction

Supreme court | Conflict of Laws | Enforcement of foreign judgments | Prerequisites for enforcement

Quebec resident into contract with corporation operating in Utah. Dispute arose as to amount owed to corporation according to contract. Corporation brought application before Utah court against resident. Resident brought motion to dismiss before Utah court. Default judgment was rendered by Utah court against resident. Corporation sought to have that decision recognized in Quebec and declared enforceable against resident. Superior Court held that, since resident had made submissions before Utah court by raising substantive arguments in his motion to dismiss, judgment could be enforceable against him. Resident’s appeal was dismissed and resident appealed before Supreme Court of Canada. Appeal dismissed. By presenting substantive arguments in his motion to dismiss, resident submitted to Utah Court’s jurisdiction. In doing so, resident attempted to take advantage of proceedings initiated in Utah to resolve part, if not all, of dispute. This was sufficient to justify recognizing and enforcing Utah decision against him in Quebec. Therefore, no intervention was justified.

Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC (2019), 2019 CarswellQue 420, 2019 CarswellQue 421, 2019 SCC 13, 2019 CSC 13, Wagner C.J.C., Abella J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., Gascon J., Côté J., Brown J., Rowe J., and Martin J. (S.C.C.); affirmed (2017), 2017 CarswellQue 2806, 2017 QCCA 597, Jacques J.C.A. (ad hoc), Vézina J.C.A., and Mainville J.C.A. (C.A. Que.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Insurer should pay professional fees, judge says

New reporting requirements for trusts could be just tip of the iceberg

In a first, Sidney B. Linden Award goes to Legal Aid Ontario staff lawyer

Equitable doctrine back before Ontario court after more than a century

Digital identity verification could present big opportunities for Ontario — but big risks, too

Queen’s Law partners with McGill to combat access-to-justice issues using AI and analytics

Most Read Articles

Equitable doctrine back before Ontario court after more than a century

Insurer should pay professional fees, judge says

Digital identity verification could present big opportunities for Ontario — but big risks, too

New reporting requirements for trusts could be just tip of the iceberg