Warsaw Convention precluded claim as pleaded injury began while plaintiff was on board aircraft

Ontario civil | Air Law

CARRIAGE

Warsaw Convention precluded claim as pleaded injury began while plaintiff was on board aircraft

Plaintiff claimed damages for alleged mistreatment by flight attendants in course of international flight resulting in plaintiff’s arrest and detention when aircraft arrived in Toronto. Plaintiff claimed damages for pain and suffering, infliction of mental distress, forcible confinement and false imprisonment. Plaintiff claimed damages for severe bronchitis arising from incident. Defendants brought motion to dismiss claim arguing application of Warsaw Convention precluded claim. Article 17 of Convention applied. Pleaded injury began while plaintiff was on board aircraft, continued during disembarkation and concluded with continued detention by police. Incident in case was accident. All aspects of claim for damages of psychological harm, including punitive and exemplary damages were struck out. Claim for general damages for bodily injury of bronchitis could be pursued. Plaintiff could not succeed under Convention for damages claimed for psychological harm and mental distress based on Article 29 of Convention. Article 29 made it clear claim for aggravated and punitive damages were not recoverable if claim was made under Convention or in contract or tort.

Gontcharov v. Canjet (June 4, 2012, Ont. S.C.J., Wilson J., File No. CV-11-432902) 216 A.C.W.S. (3d) 839 (12 pp.).

 

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Right of first refusal not 'eviscerated' by discouraging rights holder: Ontario Court of Appeal

Assess witness by age at testimony on events that occurred during childhood: Ontario Court of Appeal

Ontario government seeks to cut red tape with modernized legislation

Nominate now for Canada's top legal professionals!

LSO and federation push Metrolinx to find alternative to new subway station on Osgoode Hall property

Human Right Commission backs changes to Equipment and Use of Force Regulation, use of force report

Most Read Articles

Lawyers may ask courts to invalidate their retainer agreements: Ontario Court of Appeal

Buyer who failed to complete property purchase not entitled to return of deposit: Ontario court

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds summary dismissal of malicious prosecution lawsuit

LSO and federation push Metrolinx to find alternative to new subway station on Osgoode Hall property