Legislature gave discipline committee task of fashioning penalties that would favour goal of eradicating sexual abuse of patients

Ontario civil | Health Law | Provincial matters | Regulation of health professionals

In 2009 and 2010 six female patients of medical doctor in family practice in walk-in clinic complained of improper sexual touching. Discipline Committee of College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario found doctor committed unprofessional conduct with respect to five patients, sexually abused four, committed disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct with respect to fifth, but allegations of sixth complainant were not proven. Committee suspended doctor’s licence for six months, imposed practice restrictions for 12 months, ordered training, and payment of $64,000 for complainants’ therapy, and $35,000 in costs. College successfully appealed from penalty. Doctor appealed. Appeal allowed; disciplinary committee’s penalty was restored. Disciplinary committee crafted careful penalty that reflected principle of protection of public while balancing other principles that it was required to consider, including proportionality and rehabilitation. Disciplinary committee was manifestly concerned with paramount principles of protection of public and accepted evidence that doctor posed low risk of recidivism. It was implicit that discipline committee was confident that his behaviour could be corrected, even if prurient interest could not be completely ruled out. Legislature gave discipline committee task of fashioning penalties that would favour goal of eradicating sexual abuse of patients while taking into account and balancing other relevant factors and unlike criminal sentences, self-regulated professions were mandated to make these determinations. Divisional Court had neither mandate nor evidentiary basis to intervene, let alone change, penalty range for entire category of behaviour and changing penalty range was effectively arbitrary exercise.

College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario v. Peirovy (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 6790, 2018 ONCA 420, Paul Rouleau J.A., M.L. Benotto J.A., and L.B. Roberts J.A. (Ont. C.A.); reversed (2017), 2017 CarswellOnt 379, 2017 ONSC 136, Molloy J., Dambrot J., and Ramsay J. (Ont. Div. Ct.).

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Ontario should switch to no-cost class actions, law commission says

AG names nominating authority for construction disputes

Fasken’s Sarah Graves joins Kidney Cancer Canada board

Legal clinic workers join Ontario professionals’ union

Statement of Principles will be debated again September, LSO says

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

Most Read Articles

Lawyer's negligence case sheds light on rules for expert witnesses

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

Small claims court judges have little sway on anti-SLAPP cases

Orlando Da Silva named chief administrator of ATSSC