Fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence

Ontario civil | Appeal

FRESH EVIDENCE

Fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence

Appellant noted former solicitor in default. Trial judge found solicitor had not served appellant well but concluded appellant failed to establish any damages arising from dismissal of her two actions solicitor was handling. Appellant sought to adduce fresh evidence. Appellant appealed. Appeal allowed. Trial judge provided no explanation for why appellant should not have judgment for retainer paid to former solicitor and appellant was entitled to that amount. There was nothing in record or in fresh evidence to establish any other damages resulting from solicitor’s actions. Motion for fresh evidence was dismissed because fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence before trial.
Roberge v. Munro (Mar. 26, 2015, Ont. C.A., Robert J. Sharpe J.A., S.E. Pepall J.A., and K. van Rensburg J.A., File No. CA C58831) 251 A.C.W.S. (3d) 546.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Legal aid investments save governments money all over the world, Canadian researchers find

New real estate law podcast begins by tackling cannabis regulations

80% of legal employers prefer technical skills to personality

Torys’ Linda Plumpton named to American College of Trial Lawyers

Pressure mounts for immigration lawyers working with Latin American clients

$100K prize offered by Canadian legal tech start-up

Most Read Articles

OPP charges former tax lawyer with fraud and obstruction of justice

New facets of pure economic loss rule could have huge implications for businesses

Does solicitor-client privilege protect information shared with a legal app?

Court addresses the denial of dependent support for egregious conduct