Fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence

Ontario civil | Appeal

FRESH EVIDENCE

Fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence

Appellant noted former solicitor in default. Trial judge found solicitor had not served appellant well but concluded appellant failed to establish any damages arising from dismissal of her two actions solicitor was handling. Appellant sought to adduce fresh evidence. Appellant appealed. Appeal allowed. Trial judge provided no explanation for why appellant should not have judgment for retainer paid to former solicitor and appellant was entitled to that amount. There was nothing in record or in fresh evidence to establish any other damages resulting from solicitor’s actions. Motion for fresh evidence was dismissed because fresh evidence could have been obtained through reasonable diligence before trial.
Roberge v. Munro (Mar. 26, 2015, Ont. C.A., Robert J. Sharpe J.A., S.E. Pepall J.A., and K. van Rensburg J.A., File No. CA C58831) 251 A.C.W.S. (3d) 546.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Criminal lawyers wary of sharing contact tracing with law enforcement

LSO should pay $46K to lawyer, tribunal says

Tribunal finds that spilling tea while stopped at a red light is not an automobile accident

Workplace safety tribunal shares best practices for teleconference hearings

Law foundation approves grants for investor rights projects of UToronto Law, Osgoode and others

Ontario Bar Association hosts free online information sessions on elder law for Seniors’ Month

Most Read Articles

List of resources for lawyers on how to be an ally to racialized colleagues

LSO should pay $46K to lawyer, tribunal says

Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to host mental health webinar

Criminal lawyers wary of sharing contact tracing with law enforcement