Federal government was required to revise reports relating to Indian residential schools settlement agreement

Ontario civil | Aboriginal Peoples

CROWN RELATIONSHIP

Federal government was required to revise reports relating to Indian residential schools settlement agreement

Federal government and other entities settled class actions with respect to harm arising from Indian residential schools. Settlement terms were specified in Indian residential schools settlement agreement. Agreement provided for common experience payment for all students who were residents at schools. Agreement provided independent assessment process for claims for compensation for particular acts of abuse. Agreement required federal government to search for and report on information relating to students and abusers at school to facilitate independent assessment process. Federal government gathered information relating to particular incident at school A only after being ordered to do so. Federal government failed to provide adequate reports of information obtained. Certain students who had attended school A and school H and were claiming compensation under independent assessment process brought request for directions as to whether federal government had complied with its report writing and information sharing obligations under agreement. Request granted in part. Federal government was required to revise reports relating to agreement so as to specify documents relating to particular incidents of abuse. Federal government was to provide unredacted copies of publicly available court records to independent assessment process administrators, and to students or their lawyers if requested. Finally, federal government was required to provide redacted copies of other documents gathered for independent assessment process. Agreement required reports to identify all allegations or incidents of physical or sexual abuse at schools in meaningful way that made it easier for students to advance their claims and made it more efficient for adjudicators to decide claims. This was bargained-for term of agreement. Agreement did not require that all documents be unredacted. Redaction of documents was another major item in negotiations and required balancing of disclosure necessary for adjudication of claims and sensitivity to privacy of students and alleged abusers. Federal government was not required to update reports relating to school H since reports had not been filed to establish problems with them.
Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General) (Jun. 23, 2015, Ont. S.C.J., Perell J., File No. 00-CV-192059) 255 A.C.W.S. (3d) 802.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Ford government’s cuts to Toronto city council ruled constitutional

Histories of Canadian law and Métis people are entwined, says Jean Teillet

More women are on TSX company boards - but there’s slow progress to the C-Suite, says Osler

GM lawyer Michael Smith becomes partner at Bennett Jones

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

House of Commons reveals legal fee reimbursement over $54k

Most Read Articles

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

Man discharged from his fourth bankruptcy

Insurance lawyers reveal their referral philosophies

Court of Appeal rules auto insurer not liable for parental negligence claim stemming from accident