Unreasonable for officer to make decision in isolation of applicant’s actual situation

Federal court | Immigration and Citizenship | Admission | Application for temporary resident or immigrant visa

Applicant was citizen of Nigeria who was convicted of distribution of heroin in United States in 1993 and deported from that country. Applicant came to Canada in 1998 and claimed refugee status. Refugee application and application for review based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds were dismissed. Applicant was found inadmissible to Canada because of criminality and misrepresentation, and deportation and expulsion order issued. Applicant made three criminal rehabilitation applications and second application under humanitarian and compassionate grounds. In 2015 applicant filed application for temporary resident permit which was refused. Applicant was removed to Nigeria in 2015. Applicant was in 16-year common law relationship with Canadian citizen and operated successful Toronto business. Applicant brought application for judicial review of refusal of temporary resident permit. Application granted. Immigration officer relied solely on narrow submissions presented by self-represented applicant. It was unreasonable for officer to ignore applicant’s long immigration history and particularly 16-year common law relationship and outstanding humanitarian and compassionate application. Officer’s determination was made in complete isolation of applicant’s actual situation. Matter was remitted for re-determination by different officer.

Alabi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 858, 2017 FC 294, Glennys L. McVeigh J. (F.C.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Lenczner Slaght's Susannah Alleyne talks new inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility role

Ontario court deducts COVID-19 income benefits from past income loss award in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results

Ontario Superior Court upholds cell phone search as lawful and rejects bid to exclude evidence

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Most Read Articles

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Jury award in motorcycle crash lawsuit surpasses defendant's final offer: Ontario Superior Court

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results