It was open to Appeal Division to refuse to hear new evidence

Federal appeal | Pensions | Federal and provincial pension plans | Federal pension plans

Social Security Tribunal Appeal Division allowed Minister of Employment and Social Development’s appeal from General Division’s decision. Appeal Division held that s. 49, not s. 44, of Canada Pension Plan (CPP) applied for purpose of calculating applicant’s retirement pension contributory period. Appeal Division confirmed that applicant’s contributory period was 79 months rather than 75 months. Applicant brought application for judicial review. Application dismissed. It was reasonable for Appeal Division to apply s. 49 of CPP to calculate contributory period in context of retirement pension. It was open to Appeal Division to refuse to hear new evidence.

Bartlett v. Canada (Attorney General) (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 5169, 2018 FCA 165, Nadon J.A., Stratas J.A., and Richard Boivin J.A. (F.C.A.).

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

‘Insurmountable’ access to justice issues could come from Ontario’s Crown immunity change

CLUC welcomes new members

Laila Paszti joins Norton Rose Fulbright as of counsel

Ontario should switch to no-cost class actions, law commission says

AG names nominating authority for construction disputes

Fasken’s Sarah Graves joins Kidney Cancer Canada board

Most Read Articles

Lawyer's negligence case sheds light on rules for expert witnesses

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

Small claims court judges have little sway on anti-SLAPP cases

Orlando Da Silva named chief administrator of ATSSC