Federal Appeal


Federal and provincial pension plans
Application for judicial review struck as applicant already granted hearing de novo
General Division of Social Security Tribunal (GD) determined that applicant was not eligible for CPP disability benefits. Appeal Division of Social Security Tribunal (AD) allowed leave to appeal but determined that ground alleging erroneous finding of fact had no reasonable chance of success, that AD could not consider new evidence prepared after hearing before GD, that leave decision had restricted grounds of appeal to five errors of law, and that applicant’s appeal succeeded on grounds that GD erred in law and referred matter back to GD for de novo hearing. Applicant brought application for judicial review of AD’s analysis of scope of appeal. Crown brought motion to strike application. Motion granted; application dismissed. Whether applicant’s appeal was inappropriately limited would have no bearing on ultimate entitlement to benefits as applicant was already granted hearing de novo before GD. Issue of whether AD had authority to limit scope of appeal was purely academic. It was preferable to determine issue in genuine adversarial context. In light of referral back, lack of live controversy between parties that would affect applicant’s entitlement to benefits, and academic nature of relief sought, matter was moot and it would be uneconomical use of judicial resources to allow application to proceed.
Cardin v. Canada (Attorney General) (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 3441, 2017 FCA 150, Wyman W. Webb J.A., David G. Near J.A., and Donald J. Rennie J.A. (F.C.A.).
cover image


Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll

Law Times reports that there is the highest number of lawyer candidates in the upcoming Law Society of Ontario Bencher election since 1995, but turn-out is declining. Do you think voting should be mandatory for all lawyers and paralegals in this election?