Skip to content

Editorial: Terrible trickle-down

Bureaucracy has a way of deadening the soul to the very real and very serious consequences of denying each person the right to a fair and timely court hearing.

There are currently nine judicial vacancies in Ontario’s courts — seven in the Superior Court, one in the Court of Appeal, and one in Family Court. As Law Times reports, these delays have serious consequences.

Judicial vacancies mean a longer wait for court hearings.

Spinoff effects include people charged with offences sitting in custody longer, families immersed in chaotic and emotionally messy legal disputes longer, and lawyers working unpaid overtime in drawn-out cases. Ontario lawyers are calling on Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Jody Wilson-Raybould to appoint new judges to fill the vacant spots. The complaints are hardly unique to Ontario — judges from Quebec and Alberta have aired their grievances about shortages, too.  They’re right. What’s the holdup?

This is the statement provided by the spokesman for Wilson-Raybould:

“We have committed to a review of the entire judicial appointments process, based on the principles of openness, transparency, merit and diversity. This review will achieve a greater degree of diversity within the Canadian judiciary, so that it will truly reflect the face of Canada,” it read. “I will work with interested stakeholders, including the judiciary, and Canadians on these appointments.

“In the interim, our government is moving forward on measures that will facilitate appointments to fill highly pressing judicial vacancies as soon as possible.”

Explanations of what’s to be expected to address the vacancies remain few, and the little information available does not allay the concerns of those most inconvenienced and affected.

The lack of specifics is troubling, and there is no clear direction about what the legal community can expect next.

Get on with it.

  • Reforms needed

    karen crozier
    I hope the Law Times is not afraid to let a JD say there is urgent need for reform of judicial selection procedures to protect justice, the many excellent justices we have, prevent corruption, and preserve the independence of the court. We need:.
    1.. 30 days public notice of prospective appointees
    2. Separate court and law society buildings - No other province allows the law society to share the court seat due to cultural and social influence that would spill over. 3. Investigations of case hiding. 4. Acces to all public decisions. Jusr as Malaysia removed 37 judges who lied on their applications, we must do likewise where past conflicts and case hiding were not disclosed and explained. The Greylord scandal in Chicago 1970s-80s convicted 78 judges and court officials. This is our Greylord.
  • Ms

    Karen Crozier
    Ontario has a very serious justice problem that must be addressed. Until 2008-2009 the Law Society of Upper Canada did not reveal complaints against lawyers or decisions when lawyers successfully defended regulatory complaints against them. This corrupted the case law so no lawyers, or very few, had access to decisions they needed to have defended themselves from regulatory complaints.

    It allowed the successful to submit unblemished records when they wanted to be judges.

    How does this impact the selection of judges? Effectively hiding one half of the case law, which apparently continues to some extent, is obstruction of justice carried out in concert by benchers and their counsel,staff, executives, etc. -many of whom were appointed to the bench, even with LSUC blessings. The LSUC plans to ride out the scandal and hope no one notices. continued.....

cover image


Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll

Lawyers say a recent decision is one of many cases to come before the courts that illustrates how the legal system is grappling with valuing crypto-currency. Do you anticipate that in the next year you will encounter any cases or clients where crypto-currency is involved?