Privacy commissioner urges Ontario government to amend proposed electronic monitoring legislation

Amendments to ensure transparency and protection of workers' privacy

Privacy commissioner urges Ontario government to amend proposed electronic monitoring legislation

The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario has called on the provincial government to amend proposed legislation concerning the electronic monitoring of employees in the province by their employers. 

On Feb. 24, the provincial government introduced Bill 88, requiring employers with 25 or more employees to develop and publish an internal electronic monitoring policy. The policy must set out whether, how, in what circumstances and why the employer electronically monitors its employees. 

In a letter addressed to Standing Committee on Social Policy Chair Natalia Kusendova, Commissioner Patricia Kosseim sought amendments to the bill to require employers to furnish her office with a copy of their electronic monitoring policies to ensure transparency and protection of employees’ privacy.

“Since Bill 88 already requires these employers to have and retain such a policy, the obligation to provide a digital copy to my office would create minimal extra burden,” Kosseim wrote. “Yet this small incremental measure could significantly enhance organizations’ levels of transparency and accountability.”

In addition, Kosseim asked the government to amend the bill to authorize her office to examine electronic monitoring policies, identify emerging trends, provide education and best practices, and periodically report to the legislature on matters relating to the state of privacy of employees in the province.

“This proposed amendment would lead to a body of knowledge that could help Ontarians, employers, and lawmakers choose a wise path forward amid new technological possibilities and evolving work arrangements,” Kosseim wrote. “It could also help inform the development of future regulations under the bill.”

Moreover, Kosseim noted that the government should include a provision stating that no law, contract, or condition of employment could prevent both employers and employees from sharing, discussing, or consulting on the contents of their electronic monitoring policies with her office.

“Otherwise, a law meant to bring electronic workplace surveillance practices to light could be frustrated by countervailing attempts to keep them secret,” Kosseim wrote.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Ont. Court of Appeal allows beneficiary to exercise will’s option to buy changed ‘farming business’

More than half a million dollars in costs awarded to victims of abuse in mental health institution

Ontario Court of Justice welcomes Caroline Kim as new judge

Employment insurance sickness benefits deductible from income replacement benefits: Ontario court

Reasonable grounds for drug arrest without direct witnessing of crime: Ontario Court of Appeal

Seized cash circumstantial evidence that accused is drug trafficker: Ontario Court of Appeal

Most Read Articles

LSO tribunal allows lawyer accused of theft to practise in-house pending merits determination

OBA raises concerns over Tribunals Ontario's 'digital-first' approach to hearings

Human Rights Commission reacts to proposed migrant worker housing by-law in Kingsville

Reasonable grounds for drug arrest without direct witnessing of crime: Ontario Court of Appeal