Proposed class action for security guards’ unpaid wages settles for $2.9 million

Lawyer for security guards calls the settlement “welcome financial support during the COVID-19 crisis”

Proposed class action for security guards’ unpaid wages settles for $2.9 million

The parties to a proposed class action for the alleged unpaid wages of and unlawful deductions against security guards have agreed upon a settlement amount of $2.9 million.

In Horner v. Primary Response Inc. et al., plaintiff Kionna Horner initiated the action on behalf of security guards employed by Primary Response in Ontario from Feb. 27, 2011 to Jan. 15, 2018, except for those hired under a collective agreement. Garda Canada Security Corporation, which bought Primary Response on Jan. 15, 2018, was also impleaded as a defendant.

If approved by the court, the settlement will fully and finally resolve the matter. Under the agreement, the defendants will consent to the certification of the class action and will pay the settlement amount, which includes interest, costs, administration expenses, taxes and class counsel fees and disbursements.

The parties went through a two-day mediation process to reach the settlement with the assistance of William Kaplan, an experienced mediator.

The statement of claim for the class action, launched in August 2018, alleged that defendant Primary Response breached the Employment Standards Act, 2000 and the employment contracts by asking the security guards to be present for work at least fifteen minutes early without the corresponding compensation, by unlawfully averaging the overtime pay of the security guards over a two-week pay period despite the expiry of the overtime averaging agreement and by making unlawful uniform deductions from payroll.

The proposed class action also claimed that Primary Response and Garda, which was alleged should be treated as a single employer under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and as common employers under the Employment Standards Act, should be held liable for breach of their duty of good faith and for negligence in their performance of the employment contracts.

Goldblatt Partners LLP acted on behalf of the security guards. Josh Mandryk, an associate at the firm, told the Toronto Star that the settlement would furnish “access to justice for thousands of precarious workers who’d otherwise face significant barriers to enforcing their rights at work.”

“This settlement provides a speedy resolution to the historical claims of the class members, which we hope comes as welcome financial support during the COVID-19 crisis,” Christine Davies of Goldblatt Partners told the Star.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law school students develop app to automate police complaint process

What employment law clients are saying about the new three-day COVID-related paid sick leave

Ontario Court of Appeal ruling ‘sending alarm bells’ through construction industry, says lawyer

Ombudsman for crime victims backs all recommendations of missing person investigations report

Tribunal erred in conflating ‘but for’ test with direct causation test: Divisional Court

Ruling affirms racial profiling can be result of a police officer's unconscious bias: lawyers

Most Read Articles

Ruling affirms racial profiling can be result of a police officer's unconscious bias: lawyers

Next phase of Restoule Treaty annuity appeal beginning in early June

Legal-tech platform promoting access to justice for marginalized communities presented at conference

Insurer not liable when insured’s move from home triggered policy’s vacancy exclusion clause