Democracy Watch asks Superior Court to cancel new tribunal appointment system

New selection process is illegal and unconstitutional, Democracy Watch says

Democracy Watch asks Superior Court to cancel new tribunal appointment system

Democracy Watch has filed a notice of application against the Ontario government to challenge the new appointments and reappointments policies for adjudicative tribunal members.

Last November, the Ford government introduced changes to the appointments and reappointments system across different tribunals in Ontario, including the Human Rights Tribunal, the Landlord and Tenant Board, the Child and Family Services Review Board, the Social Benefits Tribunal and the Environmental Review Tribunal.

These changes have led to appointments for short and inconsistent terms of two years or shorter, with limited job security, said Democracy Watch, a citizen group that pushes for democratic reform and government accountability. In the new system, these members essentially serve at the pleasure of the Cabinet, with their reappointments also controlled by the Cabinet, added Democracy Watch.

The suit before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice alleges that the new system is unconstitutional. It infringes the principles of administrative tribunal independence and the rule of law and violates s. 14 of the Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, as well as the purpose of the Act as a whole, according to the challenge. The subject provision states that the selection process for appointing members should be merit-based and competitive.

The new system lacks impartiality and gives the Cabinet ministers more control over tribunal members, which in turn endangers the tribunal members’ independence, said Democracy Watch.

“The Ford government’s changes put 32 tribunals that handle more than 150,000 important human rights, citizen, community and environmental protection cases each year much more under the control of Cabinet ministers, which politicizes and weakens the enforcement of several key laws across Ontario,” said Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch.

Democracy Watch said that many experienced tribunal members were terminated, while many experienced members who previously served in one tribunal were turned away when they tried to apply for another. Many tribunal positions are also currently vacant, the group added.

“There has also been an increase in complaints about tribunals filed with the Ontario Ombudsman (who is investigating delays at the Landlord and Tenant Board), in part because people with less expertise but connections to the Ford government have been appointed to the tribunals and related enforcement agencies, including a Toronto police officer appointed to the Human Rights Commission,” said Democracy Watch.

The application seeks the cancellation of the appointments made under the new system. While the old system was imperfect, it involved a more independent, merit-based system which afforded tribunal members better job security and which reduced vacancies, the group said.

Jameel Madhany and Lindsay Woods of Lerners LLP are acting for Democracy Watch.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

After removing exemption, LSO votes down motion to reduce annual fees for retired lawyers over 65

Pilot explores how social work students can help fill funding gaps in community legal clinics

Lawyer suspended, allegedly mishandled and misappropriated trust funds, lied to LSO

COVID-19 and the holidays: Personal injury firms fundraising for frontline healthcare workers

Law Society passes fee reduction, COVID-19 relief, some Benchers say measures fall short

New differential privacy algorithm allows for secure sharing of machine-learning legal tech: lawyer

Most Read Articles

Legal profession must ensure inclusion for lawyers with mental health and addiction issues: lawyer

New differential privacy algorithm allows for secure sharing of machine-learning legal tech: lawyer

Ontario Review Board cannot order accused to attend Zoom hearing: Court

Superior Court asked to clarify effect of revocation of temporary suspension of limitation periods