Mother brought children to Ontario and refused to return home to UAE, order to return stayed: court

The father claimed wrongful detention by the mother

Mother brought children to Ontario and refused to return home to UAE, order to return stayed: court
The mother brought the children and left the family residence with no intention of returning

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled that a father’s motion to compel the return of his children to the United Arab Emirates must be stayed, despite the mother having taken the children to Ontario and refusing to return to their habitual residence.

In N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 688, the appellant travelled with her children to Ontario while the respondent remained in UAE, expecting their prompt return. However, the appellant later refused to return. The respondent sought return of the children before the Ontario courts, citing their wrongful detention. The appellant argued that the children would suffer serious harm if removed from Ontario, since they would be involuntarily separated from her. She further alleged that the rules of the UAE courts are characterized by gender-based inequalities, which may preclude the consideration of the best interests of the children.

The application judge declined to exercise jurisdiction over the case, stating that the appellant failed to satisfy the balance of probabilities of the alleged harm the children would suffer, and ordered that the children return to UAE.

The appellant filed an expedited appeal with this Court, while in the meantime, the respondent applied for divorce and a guardianship and custody order in the UAE. The divorce was granted before this Court’s decision was released.

The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the application judge’s decision to decline the exercise of jurisdiction.

The appellant intends to apply for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada and filed with this Court a motion to stay the order to return the children to the UAE.

The Court stayed the order pending the appeal. “Neither the proposed application for leave to appeal with the Supreme Court nor the request for stay are frivolous or clearly without merit.” The Court acknowledged that the stay would result in the children remaining largely separated from their father, which is not in their best interest. However, the Court ruled that the risk of irreparable harm is diminished considering that the respondent had been able to maintain a meaningful bond with the children despite their physical separation. On the other hand, there would be risk of irreparable harm if the stay was not granted.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Panel to discuss role of litigation and regulation in managing justice system use of AI

Ontario avoided public consultation in making decisions with environmental impact: auditor general

Court denies appeal of vac-truck operator injured during chemical spill clean-up

Expectation of materialization not a factor in determining contingent interest in land: court

Law Society of Ontario defers vote on eliminating mandatory minimum wage for articling students

Court clarifies role of public correction in secondary market misrepresentation claims

Most Read Articles

Law Society of Ontario defers vote on eliminating mandatory minimum wage for articling students

Court clarifies role of public correction in secondary market misrepresentation claims

Court finds party can recover fees for expert reports, whether expert called to give evidence or not

Panel to discuss role of litigation and regulation in managing justice system use of AI