Letter: CDLPA opposes paralegal motion

The completed five-year reviews on paralegal regulation by the Law Society of Upper Canada and David Morris have served to inspire a conversation within the justice system about the scope of practice of the paralegal profession that’s now focusing on a motion put forward by representatives of the paralegal community for debate at the upcoming LSUC annual general meeting (see “Time to expand paralegal rights?” on April 29).

The County and District Law Presidents’ Association will be speaking against this motion as drafted. We insist that there remains the need and opportunity to further improve the regulatory environment for the paralegal profession to better protect the public and improve access to justice before matters related to scope of practice can be considered.

Specific to this motion, we hold the strong opinion that the Morris report and its recommendations were not designed to be accomplished or considered in isolation. It is neither possible nor appropriate to establish a task force designed to focus on three of 11 recommendations, as the motion suggests, especially when they are intertwined and the success of each may depend on the implementation of others.

We believe the independent review by Morris provided a reasonable and fair assessment of the paralegal profession in Ontario and offers a measured approach through which expansion may ultimately be considered. CDLPA supports the continued evolution of the profession as contemplated by the entirety of the report and therefore cannot support the expansion of the scope of practice independent of the other challenges still to be addressed.

Janet Whitehead,
chairwoman, CDLPA

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

OBA Innovator-in-Residence Colin Lachance aims to help lawyers integrate AI into their practice

Ontario Superior Court rejects mining company’s breach of agreement and confidentiality claims

Ontario Superior Court orders plaintiff to pay substantial costs despite injury claims

Labour and employment lawyer Muneeza Sheikh opens her practice as part of 'building a brand'

Ontario Superior Court awards damages in domestic assault case due to defendant's default

Ontario Privacy Commissioner calls for stronger access and privacy protections

Most Read Articles

Labour and employment lawyer Muneeza Sheikh opens her practice as part of 'building a brand'

Ontario Superior Court awards damages in domestic assault case due to defendant's default

Ont. Superior Court upholds Human Rights Tribunal's denial of reconsideration in discrimination case

Ontario Privacy Commissioner calls for stronger access and privacy protections