Taxpayer did not prove prima facie case that rebutted Minister’s assumptions

Tax court of Canada | Tax | Income tax | Employment income

Taxpayer claimed employment expenses for home office, periodicals, insurance, repairs, car expenses, meals and entertainment, gifts, travel and commission. Minister of National Revenue denied deduction of claimed employment expenses of $87,647 because appropriate documentation was not provided. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Taxpayer did not prove prima facie case that rebutted Minister’s assumptions. Section 8 of Income Tax Act did not allow deduction of commission payment in purchase of security. Form stated that taxpayer’s travel and home office were not required for his employment.

Ross v. The Queen (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 4649, 2018 CarswellNat 8095, 2018 TCC 165, 2018 CCI 165, B. Russell J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Cannabis companies use different words to tell investors about risk

BLG adds Keegan Boyd to health law group

Ontario businesses call for relaxed booze laws

MAG says Crown liability changes defend taxpayers from ‘deep-pocketed lawyers’

Law Society Tribunal allows appeal in longstanding mortgage fraud case

Angela Shaffer joins Dentons in Toronto

Most Read Articles

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

‘Insurmountable’ access to justice issues could come from Ontario’s Crown immunity change

Ontario should switch to no-cost class actions, law commission says

Statement of Principles will be debated again September, LSO says