Taxpayer did not prove prima facie case that rebutted Minister’s assumptions

Tax court of Canada | Tax | Income tax | Employment income

Taxpayer claimed employment expenses for home office, periodicals, insurance, repairs, car expenses, meals and entertainment, gifts, travel and commission. Minister of National Revenue denied deduction of claimed employment expenses of $87,647 because appropriate documentation was not provided. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Taxpayer did not prove prima facie case that rebutted Minister’s assumptions. Section 8 of Income Tax Act did not allow deduction of commission payment in purchase of security. Form stated that taxpayer’s travel and home office were not required for his employment.

Ross v. The Queen (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 4649, 2018 CarswellNat 8095, 2018 TCC 165, 2018 CCI 165, B. Russell J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil