Moving taxpayer must be ‘absent from but resident in Canada’ to get exception to ‘in Canada’ rule

Tax - Income tax - Other deductions

Prior to February 3, 2016, taxpayer did not own property in Canada, hold employment or office in Canada, own personal possessions in Canada, or hold Canadian passport or driver’s license. Taxpayer’s entire family resided in Australia and before February 3, 2016 taxpayer was not physically present in Canada. On February 2, 2016 taxpayer entered Canada with husband with intent to stay permanently and in May taxpayer applied for permanent residence status. Taxpayer claimed $59,188 as moving expenses in her return for 2016 taxation year and Minister of National Revenue issued reassessment in which deduction for moving expenses was denied. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Section 62(1) of Income Tax Act provides for deductibility from specified sources of income of moving expenses paid by taxpayer in respect of “eligible relocation” as defined in s. 248(1) of Act. It was required in clear and unambiguous terms that before move taxpayer ordinarily resided at residence in Canada and that after move taxpayer ordinarily resided at residence in Canada. Exception to “in Canada” requirement was provided only if at time of move taxpayer was “absent from but resident in Canada” and at time taxpayer commenced move, she was not absent from but resident in Canada. It could not be agreed that Interpretation Bulletin IT-178R3 concealed “in Canada” requirement and even if it did not accurately or completely describe law applicable to moving expenses, it had long been established that interpretation bulletins were not binding on taxpayer, Minister or Court. Taxpayer’s move from Australia to Canada was not “eligible relocation” and moving expenses paid by taxpayer for that move were not deductible under s. 62(1).

Ellaway v. The Queen (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 2118, 2019 TCC 118, J.R. Owen J. (T.C.C. [General Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

COVID-vaccine skeptic doctor loses anti-SLAPP case at Court of Appeal

Information and Privacy Commissioner calls for retention of public input in Policing Act amendments

Ontario Superior Court confirms party’s entitlement to broad medical and rehabilitation benefits

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds estate's right to full range of damages in a vehicle accident case

Legal groups voice concerns over Ford repeatedly saying he wants 'like-minded' judges

Upcoming FACL conference focused on AI’s impact on profession, advancing careers of Asian lawyers

Most Read Articles

Legal groups voice concerns over Ford repeatedly saying he wants 'like-minded' judges

COVID-vaccine skeptic doctor loses anti-SLAPP case at Court of Appeal

Legal Innovation Zone launches program to help legal tech entrepreneurs turn ideas into businesses

Upcoming FACL conference focused on AI’s impact on profession, advancing careers of Asian lawyers