Basis for purported vehicle allowance paid by employer to taxpayer did not qualify as being reasonable

Tax court of Canada | Tax | Income tax | Employment income

Taxpayer was employee of commercial snow and ice clearing business whose responsibilities included making snow runs, which he made in his own vehicle. Snow runs included taxpayer driving throughout area on fixed route going past each of employee’s client locations to visually check if clearing or further clearing or salting of snow and ice was required. Distance of snow run fixed route was approximately 92 kilometres, and snow runs were done as employer deemed needed and no record was kept by employer of number of snow runs done. Taxpayer was paid vehicle allowance by employer to compensate for snow runs, which was fixed in amount of $9,100 annually and taxpayer did not report this amount on tax returns, because he thought it was deductible. Minister added $9,100 to taxpayer’s income for two taxation years on basis that these amounts were not reasonable vehicle allowances. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. S. 6(1)(b)(x) and s. 6(1)(b)(vii.1) of Income Tax Act made it clear that vehicular allowances were not excludable from income unless allowance amount was based on number of kilometres for which vehicle was used in course of employment. In this case, $9,100 was amount calculated on basis of average number of snow runs total, but number of snow runs made was estimated, meaning actual number of kilometres specifically driven by taxpayer was not known but estimated. Effect of legislation was clear that basis for purported vehicle allowance paid by employer to taxpayer did not qualify as being reasonable, because amounts paid were not determined based solely on kilometres actually driven.

Positano v. The Queen (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 4110, 2018 TCC 160, B. Russell J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.


Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil