Trial judge erred in refusing to authorize institution of class action

Civil Practice and Procedure - Class and Representative Proceedings - Representative or class proceedings under class proceedings legislation

Series of sexual assaults were committed by members of Congregation of Holy Cross both on premises of Congregation and that of Saint-Joseph’s Oratory. Representative of victims brought motion for authorization to institute class action against Congregation and Oratory. Trial judge refused to authorize institution of class action, but majority of Quebec Court of Appeal reversed that judgment. Congregation and Oratory appealed before Supreme Court of Canada. Appeals dismissed . Trial judge’s decision was tainted by numerous errors, of fact and of law, in relation to conditions set out in art. 575 of Code of Civil Procedure . First, trial judge’s assertion that application was practically silent regarding involvement on Oratory’s part was incorrect. Second, trial judge erred in assessing commonality of issues, particularly by pointing out that there were differences between the situations of class members . Third, trial judge was essentially of view that no specific, tangible facts were alleged in application in support of claim that Congregation knew about assaults on children allegedly committed by its members. Fourth, trial judge erred in finding that representative did not have competence needed to properly represent class members . It was therefore open to Court of Appeal to intervene and substitute its own assessment for that of trial judge with respect to all conditions. Court of Appeal’s decision to authorize institution of class action against both Congregation and Oratory should be upheld.

L'Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal c. J.J. (2019), 2019 CarswellQue 4223, 2019 CarswellQue 4224, 2019 SCC 35, 2019 CSC 35, Wagner C.J.C., Abella J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., Gascon J., Côté J., Brown J., Rowe J., and Martin J. (S.C.C.); affirmed (2017), 2017 CarswellQue 8365, 2017 QCCA 1460, Gagnon J.C.A., Marcotte J.C.A., and Healy J.C.A. (C.A. Que.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

 

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Amid enactment of sweeping law enforcement Bill C-75, LSO seeks status quo for students, paralegals

LSO must stand up for racialized licensees, says prospective returning bencher

OBA summit to bring together legal sector equality advocates

Federal government names Canadian Accessibility Standards Development Organization officers

Baker McKenzie adds senior tech strength to global M&A team

Alexander Holburn opens Toronto office

Most Read Articles

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa

Province should be cautious using ADR for domestic violence cases, say lawyers

Canadian law firms spending more on legal tech, says Thomson Reuters