Responsibility of enforcing s. 276 regime was with trial judge

Evidence – Character - Character of complainant

Prior sexual conduct in first degree murder trial. Deceased sex trade worker died from large perforation in her vaginal wall after accused stuck his hand in her vagina while she was intoxicated on second night they had sexual relations. Accused testified about sexual activity with deceased on both nights although he did not apply under Criminal Code s. 276 to adduce such evidence of deceased’s prior sexual history and no voir dire was held to determine admissibility of such evidence. Trial judge did not give limiting instruction to jury on permissible and impermissible uses of deceased’s prior sexual activity evidence. Jury acquitted accused of first degree murder and manslaughter and Crown appealed. Court of Appeal allowed appeal and ordered new trial on charge of first degree murder. Accused appealed. Appeal allowed in part; new trial ordered on charge of manslaughter. Crown’s failure to object to accused’s testimony regarding deceased’s prior sexual activity was not fatal to its appeal as responsibility of enforcing s. 276 regime was with trial judge. Section 276 regime applied as first degree murder charge was premised on sexual assault with weapon, which was one of offences listed in s. 276(1). Crown’s reference to deceased as “prostitute” in its opening address did not exclude application of s. 276(2) to accused’s evidence. Trial judge’s failure to comply with s. 276 impaired dignity and privacy of deceased, truth-seeking process, trial fairness and impacted instructions to jury on defence of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent.

R. v. Barton (2019), 2019 CarswellAlta 985, 2019 CarswellAlta 986, 2019 SCC 33, 2019 CSC 33, Wagner C.J.C., Abella J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., Côté J., Brown J., and Rowe J. (S.C.C.); reversed (2017), 2017 CarswellAlta 1167, 2017 ABCA 216, Catherine Fraser C.J.A., Jack Watson J.A., and Sheilah Martin J.A. (Alta. C.A.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Amid enactment of sweeping law enforcement Bill C-75, LSO seeks status quo for students, paralegals

LSO must stand up for racialized licensees, says prospective returning bencher

OBA summit to bring together legal sector equality advocates

Federal government names Canadian Accessibility Standards Development Organization officers

Baker McKenzie adds senior tech strength to global M&A team

Alexander Holburn opens Toronto office

Most Read Articles

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa

Province should be cautious using ADR for domestic violence cases, say lawyers

Canadian law firms spending more on legal tech, says Thomson Reuters