Husband’s retirement and resulting reduction of income was material change in circumstances

Family Law – Support - Spousal support under Divorce Act and provincial statutes

Parties were married in 1972, separated in 2000, and were divorced in 2003. Parties had separation agreement in 2002. Husband remarried and had two dependent children. Wife did not remarry. Husband retired in May 2018 and sought to terminate spousal support along with requirement to maintain life insurance to secure support. Husband brought motion to change final order from 2004 requiring husband to pay spousal support of $1,400 per month; wife brought cross-motion to dismiss husband’s motion and to direct husband to obtain assessment from valuator to determine portion of his RRSP attributable to post-separation growth. Ruling was made. Husband’s motion was granted; spousal support was terminated. Husband’s retirement and resulting reduction of income was material change in circumstances. Husband did not retire to avoid paying spousal support.

Angulo v. Angulo (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 3399, 2019 ONSC 1456, C. Horkins J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Amid enactment of sweeping law enforcement Bill C-75, LSO seeks status quo for students, paralegals

LSO must stand up for racialized licensees, says prospective returning bencher

OBA summit to bring together legal sector equality advocates

Federal government names Canadian Accessibility Standards Development Organization officers

Baker McKenzie adds senior tech strength to global M&A team

Alexander Holburn opens Toronto office

Most Read Articles

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa

Province should be cautious using ADR for domestic violence cases, say lawyers

Canadian law firms spending more on legal tech, says Thomson Reuters