Human Rights Code protects employees who suffer discrimination with sufficient connection to employment

Supreme court | Human Rights | Practice and procedure | Commissions, tribunals and boards of inquiry

Complainant was civil engineer who was subjected to derogatory comments and emails regarding his place of origin, religion and sexual orientation from co-worker who worked for another employer on same construction site. Complainant filed complaint with British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal alleging discrimination contrary to s. 13(1)(b) of Human Rights Code. Co-worker and CC Ltd. unsuccessfully brought application to dismiss on basis of lack of jurisdiction, submitting that complainant was not in employment relationship with them. Co-worker unsuccessfully brought application for judicial review. Co-worker appealed, which was allowed on basis that s. 13(1)(b) was not so wide as to encompass conduct by any person that might have adversely affected employee in their employment. Tribunal appealed. Appeal allowed. Human Rights Tribunal did not err in concluding that co-worker’s conduct was covered by s. 13(1)(b) of Code. Scope of s. 13(1)(b) of Code was not limited to protecting employees solely from discriminatory harassment by their superiors in workplace. Section 13(1)(b) did not restrict who could perpetrate discrimination but rather it defined who could suffer employment discrimination. Code’s protection extended to all employees who suffered discrimination with sufficient connection to their employment context, which may include discrimination by their co-workers even when co-workers had different employer.

British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk (2017), 2017 CarswellBC 3506, 2017 CarswellBC 3507, 2017 SCC 62, 2017 CSC 62, McLachlin C.J.C., Abella J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., Wagner J., Côté J., Brown J., and Rowe J. (S.C.C.); reversed (2016), 2016 CarswellBC 869, 2016 BCCA 146, MacKenzie J.A., Willcock J.A., and Fenlon J.A. (B.C. C.A.).

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Ontario should switch to no-cost class actions, law commission says

AG names nominating authority for construction disputes

Fasken’s Sarah Graves joins Kidney Cancer Canada board

Legal clinic workers join Ontario professionals’ union

Statement of Principles will be debated again September, LSO says

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

Most Read Articles

Lawyer's negligence case sheds light on rules for expert witnesses

Citing blog post, judge says lawyer withheld key case law

Small claims court judges have little sway on anti-SLAPP cases

Orlando Da Silva named chief administrator of ATSSC