Accused’s experience, education were relevant in determining if she met standard of care

Criminal Law - Offences against the person and reputation - Criminal negligence causing death

Accused was naturopath who administered nutrients by way of intravenous injection to patient. Nutrient solution for intravenous injection was prepared from separate vials that turned out to be contaminated. Patient reacted negatively almost immediately and died of endotoxic shock some hours later. Accused was arrested and charged with criminal negligence causing death and manslaughter. Trial judge was satisfied that accused had required skills to administer intravenous injections, followed required protocols and taken sufficient precautions. Based on these findings, trial judge acquitted accused of both charges and Crown appealed . Court of Appeal concluded that trial judge misstated constituting elements of offences and erred by considering accused’s training . Court of Appeal found that intravenous injection was objectively dangerous and accused’s conduct constituted marked departure from reasonable person standard. Court of Appeal set aside both acquittals, substituted conviction on charge of unlawful act manslaughter and ordered new trial on criminal negligence charge . Accused appealed . Appeal allowed . Both charges against accused required her conduct to be measured against standard of reasonable person in her circumstances. Accused’s professional experience and her education were relevant in determining whether she met applicable standard of care. Erroneous articulation of fault element for offences was irrelevant to outcome. Therefore, both acquittals were restored.

R. c. Javanmardi (2019), 2019 CarswellQue 9723, 2019 CarswellQue 9724, 2019 SCC 54, 2019 CSC 54, Wagner C.J.C., Abella J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., Côté J., Brown J., and Rowe J. (S.C.C.); reversed (2018), 2018 CarswellQue 4498, 2018 QCCA 856, Gagnon J.C.A., Marcotte J.C.A., and Hilton J.C.A. (C.A. Que.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Amid Black Lives Matter movement, less talk, more walk on diversity says Toronto lawyer Ryan Watkins

New law will encourage landlords and tenants to negotiate repayment agreements amid COVID-19

Changes to landlord/tenant law address jurisdictional confusion and no-fault evictions

Global IP firm Marks & Clerk continues Canadian expansion with high-profile hires

New legislation allows for eviction orders without Landlord and Tenant Board hearing

OSC invites applications to its Seniors Expert Advisory Committee

Most Read Articles

New legislation allows for eviction orders without Landlord and Tenant Board hearing

R. v. Sharma: law prohibiting conditional sentence for Indigenous woman a Charter breach

Legal Aid Ontario to launch modernized framework under new Legal Aid Services Act

Changes to landlord/tenant law address jurisdictional confusion and no-fault evictions