Police officer had no duty to make roadside breath demand immediately upon forming reasonable suspicion

Ontario criminal | Motor Vehicles | Offences and penalties | Prosecutions

Accused was acquitted of charge of failing to comply with demand made to him by a police officer, under section 254(2) of Criminal Code, to provide forthwith sample of breath. Crown appealed. Appeal allowed. Acquittal was reversed, and conviction was registered. There were two errors in law made by learned trial Judge. First, trial judge made incorrect assumption that police officer had duty to make roadside breath demand immediately upon forming reasonable suspicion. Second, trial judge erred in determination that breath demand made at 9:33 p.m. was invalid (too delayed) despite factual finding that behavior of accused himself caused delay.

R. v. Wade (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 6278, 2019 ONSC 2552, Conlan J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

How lawyers brought down internet trolls — without ever uncovering their identities

Ontario’s house-poor homeowners could be tempted by fraud and real estate lawyers are on high alert

After viral video, lawyers confirm: Yes, there is a rule against walking across the highway

Insured died before signing settlement agreement — so is it enforceable?

Social media, publicity adds pressure for cash-strapped litigants

Norton Rose Fulbright launches legal tech platform to build bespoke business apps

Most Read Articles

Could lawyers’ conduct widen rift with medical evaluators?

New trial ordered for expelled members of Ethiopian Orthodox Church

Insured died before signing settlement agreement — so is it enforceable?

After viral video, lawyers confirm: Yes, there is a rule against walking across the highway