Police officer had no duty to make roadside breath demand immediately upon forming reasonable suspicion

Ontario criminal | Motor Vehicles | Offences and penalties | Prosecutions

Accused was acquitted of charge of failing to comply with demand made to him by a police officer, under section 254(2) of Criminal Code, to provide forthwith sample of breath. Crown appealed. Appeal allowed. Acquittal was reversed, and conviction was registered. There were two errors in law made by learned trial Judge. First, trial judge made incorrect assumption that police officer had duty to make roadside breath demand immediately upon forming reasonable suspicion. Second, trial judge erred in determination that breath demand made at 9:33 p.m. was invalid (too delayed) despite factual finding that behavior of accused himself caused delay.

R. v. Wade (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 6278, 2019 ONSC 2552, Conlan J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Small claims court judges have little sway on anti-SLAPP cases

Davies' Kearney joins National Cannabis Working Group

Orlando Da Silva named chief administrator of ATSSC

Competition bureau to give lawyers more warning on deal reviews

Court fines concrete company $130,000 for worker’s death

OPSEU shows solidarity with injured workers’ groups over aid cuts

Most Read Articles

Court ruling could change law for spouses who co-own house

Audio tracks of lawyer-client chats accidentally exposed

Pressure mounts on MAG as more decry legal aid cuts

Province probing family law legislation