Officers had reasonable grounds to stop truck

Ontario criminal | Charter of Rights

ARBITRARY DETENTION OR IMPRISONMENT

Officers had reasonable grounds to stop truck

Application by accused to exclude evidence on basis that his rights under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated. Four youths escaped from youth facility. Youths were involved in two police vehicle pursuits and there was rash of thefts from motor vehicles while youths were absent without leave. Police officers saw truck being driven by young male, who was accused, and they stopped vehicle. Officers saw accused move from driver’s seat to middle seat and girl with pigtails moved from middle rear seat into just vacated driver’s seat. One officer asked accused whether he switched seats because his driver’s licence was suspended and accused responded that it was disqualified. Accused produced identification and he was arrested after officer conducted computer search and verified that accused was disqualified driver. Application dismissed. Officers had reasonable grounds to stop truck based on information that was provided to them by other officers about escape. Seat swap, which was extremely suspicious, was fresh and distinctive ground for detaining accused and it allowed officers to make further regulatory inquiries. Crown conceded that officer breached s. 10(b) of Charter and it undertook not to rely upon accused’s admission that he was disqualified driver.
R. v. Field (Feb. 6, 2015, Ont. S.C.J., A.W. Bryant J., File No. 11384) 119 W.C.B. (2d) 461.

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Walking the talk on accommodating lawyers with disabilities

Rules limiting advice on digital trading platforms could prevent investor protection: report

Ontario Superior Court denies amendment to include correctional officers in inmate assault lawsuit

Ont. Superior Court upholds decision restricting Stratford from outsourcing fire dispatch services

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Most Read Articles

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Rules limiting advice on digital trading platforms could prevent investor protection: report

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses First Nations' appeal over environmental regulation changes