Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence

Ontario criminal | Charter of Rights

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence

Crown brought application for ruling that videotaped statement given by accused to detective was voluntary. Accused applied for ruling that his rights under ss. 7 and 10(b) under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms violated. Crown application granted. Accused was advised of his right to silence before made admissions. Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence. Accused was given opportunity to speak with lawyer at each relevant point. Accused failed to establish breach of right to counsel. Even if there had been breach statements would have not been excluded. State’s conduct was not serious, statement was voluntary and reliable, and those factors weighed in favour of admission.

R. v. Cubacub (Aug. 1, 2012, Ont. S.C.J., Ricchetti J., File No. CRIMJ(P) 937/17) 102 W.C.B. (2d) 141 (22 pp.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Seven new judges join Ontario Court of Justice

Right of first refusal not 'eviscerated' by discouraging rights holder: Ontario Court of Appeal

Assess witness by age at testimony on events that occurred during childhood: Ontario Court of Appeal

Ontario government seeks to cut red tape with modernized legislation

Nominate now for Canada's top legal professionals!

LSO and federation push Metrolinx to find alternative to new subway station on Osgoode Hall property

Most Read Articles

Lawyers may ask courts to invalidate their retainer agreements: Ontario Court of Appeal

Buyer who failed to complete property purchase not entitled to return of deposit: Ontario court

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds summary dismissal of malicious prosecution lawsuit

LSO and federation push Metrolinx to find alternative to new subway station on Osgoode Hall property