Ontario Civil

Bankruptcy and Insolvency

Avoidance of transactions prior to bankruptcy

Fraudulent preferences

Payments void as transfers at undervalue when no commercial basis for transactions

N Inc. operated as re-seller of data communications equipment. Respondent S Inc. was incorporated to help out N Inc.. Receiver was appointed in April 2015 and N Inc. was assigned into bankruptcy in July 2015. Trustee noticed that N Inc. received two separate payments from S Inc. in 2013 and 2014 totalling $497,000. Following payments, N Inc. made number of payments to S Inc. in period immediately preceding receivership totaling over $1,055,581. There was no documentation to explain reason for payments. Trustee claimed transactions were transfers at undervalue to extent of excess monies received by S Inc. over and above monies paid by S Inc. to N Inc.. Trustee brought motion for declaration that transactions between N Inc. and S Inc. were transfers at undervalue and order that S Inc. pay estate of N Inc. amount of $334,841. Motion granted. There was no generally accepted commercial basis for transactions. N Inc. and S Inc. were not acting at arm’s length. By entering into transactions, N Inc. intended to defraud or delay major creditor by falsifying receivables and payables in order to mislead creditor, who was monitoring N Inc.’s financial position closely. Payments by N Inc. to S Inc. were void as transfers at undervalue. S Inc. ordered to pay estate amount of $334,841.

National Telecommunications v. Stalt (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 5360, 2018 ONSC 1101, L.A. Pattillo J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

cover image


Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll

Lawyers say a recent decision is one of many cases to come before the courts that illustrates how the legal system is grappling with valuing crypto-currency. Do you anticipate that in the next year you will encounter any cases or clients where crypto-currency is involved?