There was no legally relevant disparity in bargaining power between parties

Ontario civil | Construction Law | Contracts | Building contracts

Plaintiff developers entered into two agreements with defendant architects to provide design and architectural services for 12 townhouses. In consultation with city, architects proposed plan for 24 unit stacked back to back townhome project. Business plan prepared by developers was based on $130 per square foot. Design developed by architects cost $245 per square foot. Developers did not proceed with development and obtained permission from city to revert to original plan. Developers commenced action against architects for negligent misrepresentation. Developers sought damages and return of fees paid to architects. Architects successfully brought motion for summary judgment to dismiss developers’ action. Developers appealed. Appeal dismissed. Motion judge reasonably found there to be no legally relevant disparity in bargaining power or any other basis for finding that architects took advantage of developers. In coming to this conclusion motion judge considered level of industry experience of two parties and found that architects did not improperly induce developers to enter into Second Agreement. On this record, there was no reason to interfere with conclusion.

Manorgate Estates Inc. v. Kirkor Architects and Planners (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 10942, 2018 ONCA 617, Gloria Epstein J.A., P. Lauwers J.A., and K. van Rensburg J.A. (Ont. C.A.); affirmed (2017), 2017 CarswellOnt 18860, 2017 ONSC 7154, Favreau J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Mariam Moktar elected second vice-president of the Ontario Bar Association

Ontario Superior Court grants plaintiff's motion to add new defendant in slip and fall case

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses First Nations' appeal over environmental regulation changes

LSO bencher Murray Klippenstein given "substantial indemnity" costs in suit against legal regulator

Most Read Articles

LSO bencher Murray Klippenstein given "substantial indemnity" costs in suit against legal regulator

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Ontario Superior Court finds plaintiff contributorily negligent in slip and fall case

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings