There was no evidence of exceptional circumstances

Civil Practice and Procedure - Judgments and orders - Interest on judgments

Deputy judge granted judgment in requested amount of $4,086.82, which included prejudgment interest as requested at contractual rate of 19.8 per cent, costs as requested in amount of $650.00, and postjudgment interest. Deputy judge granted postjudgment interest at rate set out in Courts of Justice Act and not at requested contractual rate of 19.8 per cent. Plaintiff appealed concerning award for postjudgment interest. Appeal allowed. Deputy judge's judgment, as it related to postjudgment interest, was set aside and postjudgment interest was set at 19.8 per cent per annum. Deputy judge made error in law by not providing reasons for his decision with respect to postjudgment interest. Deputy judge made error in law by not awarding postjudgment interest at contractual interest rate of 19.8 per cent. There was no evidence of exceptional circumstances. No reason was seen based on evidence that was before deputy judge for why he did not follow certain binding authorities.

Capital One Bank v. Carroll (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 17377, 2019 ONSC 6261, Kumaranayake J. (Ont. Div. Ct.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala