“Shopping Centre” did not apply to phrase “community shopping centre”

Ontario civil | Municipal Law | Zoning | Zoning bylaws

S Ltd. acquired vacant thirty-three acre parcel of land,which it intended to develop. Lands were zoned Highway Commercial and were designated as HC-9. S Ltd. brought application seeking declaration that accorded with interpretation of zoning bylaw. Application dismissed. When section 12.3.9.2.4 of zoning bylaw was read in context and according to grammatical and ordinary meaning, harmoniously with scheme and object of bylaw as a whole, it was clear that definition of “Shopping Centre” did not apply to phrase “community shopping centre”. Latter was not confined to 50,000 square foot plus commercial development that consisted of six or more separated spaces for lease or occupancy.

Southside Construction v. Ingersoll (Town of) (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 18245, 2018 ONSC 6561, A.D. Grace J. (Ont. S.C.J.).


Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Liberal MPP’s bill aims to ‘depoliticize’ and clear backlog from Ontario’s tribunal system

Ontario Superior Court awards damages after real estate deals fail due to broker's conflicting roles

Ontario Superior Court rejects jury trial in motor vehicle accident case due to procedural delays

Most Read Articles

Liberal MPP’s bill aims to ‘depoliticize’ and clear backlog from Ontario’s tribunal system

Ontario Superior Court awards damages after real estate deals fail due to broker's conflicting roles

Ontario Superior Court rejects jury trial in motor vehicle accident case due to procedural delays

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute