Resignation as personal care attorney precluded party from making personal care decisions

Estates and Trusts - Power of Attorney - Types

Mother was 90 years old and had been using feed tube for nutrition and medication since 2015. Mother's three daughters, H, F and G, were her attorneys for personal care. In January 2018 when tube needed to be replaced, G was in favour of withdrawal of tube and palliative care, whereas H and F preferred doctor's advice of replacing tube. Parties attended mediation which resulted in minutes of settlement whereby parties agreed to process to obtain baseline geriatric assessment of mother. Feeding tube had to replaced on urgent basis, and G resigned as attorney for personal care. H and F arranged for geriatric assessment but did not follow process from minutes of settlement. G brought motion for order that assessment be conducted in accordance with minutes. Motion dismissed. Once G resigned, dispute-resolving framework in minutes had no purpose and did not create enforceable obligations. Resignation precluded G from making personal care decisions and formulating questions for physicians for assessment purposes.

Stein v. Brunswick (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 6477, 2019 ONSC 2303, Dietrich J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala