Purchaser could not take position that her unit was not complete for purposes of closing because of failure to complete common elements

Ontario civil | Real Property | Condominiums | Agreement of purchase and sale

Parties entered into agreement of purchase and sale of condominium unit including disclosure statement regarding parkette and gates. Vendor granted purchaser's request for extension of closing date. On closing date purchaser sought further extension until completion of parkette and gates and advised should vendor not intend to construct same, purchaser reserved right to rescind agreement due to material change to disclosure documentation of which vendor failed to give notice. On day following closing, vendor advised there was no material change to disclosure statement, dwelling was complete, purchaser failed to complete closing, and due to default, vendor was terminating agreement, taking forfeiture of deposits, and reserving right to other remedies for losses incurred. Purchaser brought application for refund of her deposit. Vendor brought application for determination of its rights under agreement. Purchaser's application dismissed. Vendor's application granted to extent that based on interpretation of agreement, purchaser breached agreement, entitling vendor to terminate, keep deposit, and sue for damages. Trial ordered regarding quantum of damages over and above forfeited deposit suffered by vendor due to purchaser's breach. Pursuant to agreement, purchaser could not take position that her unit was not complete for purposes of closing because of failure to complete common elements (parkette and gates). Legislature did not consider change in construction schedule for amenities to be material change. Since purchaser failed to close, which she had no right to do, vendor was entitled to terminate agreement and retain deposit, as provided in agreement. Purchaser could not rescind agreement where there was no longer any agreement to rescind.

Brookfield Residential (Ontario) Limited v. Lin (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 21684, 2018 ONSC 7683, H. Sachs J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.


Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Creating law that recognizes Sri Lankan genocide a 'valid exercise of Ontario's powers', OCA rules

New OBA President Kathryn Manning pinpoints ‘polarization’ as priority issue

Merits of COVID-19 benefit programs justify breach of discrimination rules, OCA rules

Ontario Superior Court judges appointed: Bhavneet Bhangu, Jasminka Kalajdzic, Jane Dietrich

Ontario Court of Appeal sets prejudgment interest rates at 8.46 percent in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court rejects $5-million claim in forest management dispute

Most Read Articles

Merits of COVID-19 benefit programs justify breach of discrimination rules, OCA rules

Ontario Court of Appeal admits event data recorder evidence in car accident case

Ontario Superior Court refuses to grant extraordinary remedies in endangered species case

Ontario Superior Court judges appointed: Bhavneet Bhangu, Jasminka Kalajdzic, Jane Dietrich