Father could not visit financial consequences of his choice on children

Ontario civil | Family Law

SUPPORT

Father could not visit financial consequences of his choice on children

Motion by mother for variation of child support. Father had been successful travel agent. Father had custody of three children after separation. Father purportedly chose to become missionary in El Salvador. Two oldest children were attending university while youngest child was currently living with mother. Father reportedly owned home with pool and expensive vehicle and travelled frequently. Father claimed he had received money from children’s paternal grandmother. Father claimed travel was covered by Air Miles accumulated on his credit card through his missionary work. Motion granted on terms. Mother was given option of proceeding with trial of issue or accepting present determination. In absence of trial of issue, father was required to pay child support based on imputed income of $60,000. Father was intentionally under-employed. Father had successful career as travel agent earning up to $100,000 before becoming missionary. Father had voluntarily chosen path that would provide him with less income than he was capable of earning. No bad faith was attributed to father but he could not visit financial consequences of his choice on his children. Newell v. Newell (June 19, 2012, Ont. S.C.J., Pedlar J., File No. 04-1074) 218 A.C.W.S. (3d) 390 (12 pp.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala