As long as taxpayers lived in Canada, they were subject to federal and provincial laws that applied to residents of Canada

Ontario civil | Tax | General principles | Constitutional issues

Taxpayers brought application for declaration that sections of Income Tax Act, Excise Tax Act and Ontario Business Corporations Act were of no force or effect because they infringed s. 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and sought return of amounts allegedly paid on account of withholdings, HST and accounting fees, and tort damages. Application judge dismissed application as taxpayers did not provide any factual or legal basis for claims. Judge noted that s. 7 of Charter did not apply to financial interests. Judge found that courts had rejected suggestion that payment of taxes was matter of choice or that income tax legislation was arbitrary. Judge did not find it necessary to go so far as to characterize taxpayers as organized pseudolegal commercial argument litigants. Taxpayers appealed. Appeal dismissed. Taxpayers were treated fairly and were provided with opportunity to file proper material with proper foundation. Taxpayers’ case was perplexing. Taxpayers’ assertions were based on selective reading of words and phrases in Charter, international covenants, and Supreme Court of Canada decisions, none of which, properly interpreted, supported their radical positions. As long as taxpayers lived in Canada, they were subject to federal and provincial laws that applied to residents of Canada, including Income Tax Act.

Howard v. Attorney General of Canada (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 6473, 2019 ONCA 351, P. Lauwers J.A., G. Pardu J.A., and I.V.B. Nordheimer J.A. (Ont. C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 1329, 2018 ONSC 785, A.D. Grace J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.


Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Walking the talk on accommodating lawyers with disabilities

Rules limiting advice on digital trading platforms could prevent investor protection: report

Ontario Superior Court denies amendment to include correctional officers in inmate assault lawsuit

Ont. Superior Court upholds decision restricting Stratford from outsourcing fire dispatch services

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Most Read Articles

The tale of Umar Zameer's two trials – the criminal court and the court of public opinion

Rules limiting advice on digital trading platforms could prevent investor protection: report

Court of Appeal clarifies how tort of abuse of process interacts with criminal proceedings

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses First Nations' appeal over environmental regulation changes