Applicant failed to establish that it was successor to or equitable assignee of repurchase option

Real Property - Sale of Land - Agreement of purchase and sale

Applicant sought specific performance to enforce its purported right to purchase land from respondent, pursuant to 1998 agreement of purchase and sale between applicant's purported predecessor, I Inc., and respondent. Agreement provided I Inc., as vendor, option to repurchase property from respondent if it was not developed as church within 10 years. In dismissing application, judge found that applicant failed to establish that it was successor to I Inc. or equitable assignee of repurchase option. Applicant appealed. Appeal dismissed. Absence of schedule of “Excluded Assets” to transfer agreement left critical gap in applicant's claim that it was successor because it had “assumed burdens and become vested with rights” of I Inc. and its alternative claim that it was equitable assignee because intention was for applicant to have benefit of repurchase option. Application judge could not determine if agreement had been transferred to applicant on record before her. Application judge did not err in not exercising her discretion to receive additional evidence. Application judge raised issue of missing schedule of “Excluded Assets” at hearing of application. There was no request for adjournment, and schedule was never provided. Applicant did not identify what additional evidence it wished to provide. Application judge was concerned that to allow additional evidence would be unfair to respondent; this exercise of discretion did not warrant appellate intervention.

Genstar Development Partnership v. The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Hamilton in Ontario (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 9582, 2019 ONCA 506, J.C. MacPherson J.A., M. Tulloch J.A., and A. Harvison Young J.A. (Ont. C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 17055, 2018 ONSC 4119, Pollak J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala