Allowing appellant to withdraw admission would prejudice other injured parties

Ontario civil | Civil Practice and Procedure | Admissions | Withdrawal of admission

Appellant’s son was convicted of criminal negligence causing bodily harm and aggravated assault as result of his actions in deliberately ramming vehicle driven by plaintiff with truck. Passenger in plaintiff’s vehicle commenced action against drivers and owners of both vehicles and plaintiff sued his own insurer claiming relief in event parties legally responsible were uninsured or underinsured. Motion judge found appellant was actual owner of truck and based on agreement between parties that appellant’s owner would respond to claim if she was owner of truck and that because limits of policies were same, action against plaintiff’s insurer could be dismissed, he dismissed action against plaintiff’s insurer. After action was dismissed, appellant moved to withdraw her agreement to enable her to argue that s. 192(2) of Highway Traffic Act made her vicariously liable for negligent driving of her son, but not for intentional assault using vehicle. Motion judge dismissed appellant’s motion concluding that her son’s conviction for criminal negligence conclusively established he was negligent, and that appellant as owner was therefore liable pursuant to s. 192(2) of Act. Appellant appealed arguing that motion judge erred in finding son’s conviction for criminal negligence foreclosed argument that son’s actions were intentional and not negligent and that he applied wrong test. Appeal dismissed. Allowing appellant to withdraw admission would prejudice other injured parties as action against plaintiff’s insurer was dismissed based on her admission and therefore that policy was no longer available to respond to loss, and prejudice could not be remedied by order for costs. Interests of justice did not require that appellant be allowed to advance her proposed arguments.

Liu v. The Personal Insurance Company (2019), 2019 CarswellOnt 1745, 2019 ONCA 104, Doherty J.A., Janet Simmons J.A., and G. Pardu J.A. (Ont. C.A.); affirmed (2017), 2017 CarswellOnt 10606, 2017 ONSC 4232, P.W. Sutherland J. (Ont. S.C.J.). (Ont. C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellOnt 380, 2018 ONSC 324, P.W. Sutherland J. (Ont. S.C.J.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Convocation adds CPD requirement to certified specialist program, will expand program to paralegals

Man loses almost entire inheritance in costs for 'reprehensible,' 'scorched earth' litigation

Ontario Court of Appeal allows Trial Lawyers Association to intervene in medical malpractice case

Ontario Court of Appeal denies extension to perfect appeal in a motor vehicle collision case

Court denies former bencher's request for civil trial data that would show extent of court delays

Ontario Court of Appeal allows wife to collect from husband's debtors through garnishment

Most Read Articles

Man loses almost entire inheritance in costs for 'reprehensible,' 'scorched earth' litigation

Ontario Court of Appeal allows Trial Lawyers Association to intervene in medical malpractice case

Convocation adds CPD requirement to certified specialist program, will expand program to paralegals

Ontario Court of Appeal denies extension to perfect appeal in a motor vehicle collision case