Claimant denied CPP disability benefits based on depression caused by homophobic discrimination

Federal court | Pensions | Federal and provincial pension plans | Federal pension plans

Claimant was denied Canada Pension Plan disability benefits by General Division of Social Security Tribunal of Canada. Basis of claim was inability to work due to anxiety and depression arising from homophobic discrimination in various workplaces Application for leave to appeal refused under s. 58 of Department of Employment and Social Development Act. Claimant applied for judicial review. Application dismissed. Claimant provided no medical evidence to show 2007 doctor’s declaration that claimant able to return to regular duties was incorrect or his condition had changed. Insufficient evidence to show he was disabled in December 2008 and his employment in 2011-2012 showed he had not been continuously disabled. Recent doctor’s report stating he was incapable of working due to anxiety and depression came several years subsequent to qualifying date of December 2008 and was considered by court in refusing leave to appeal. Not role of court to re-weigh evidence and make new determination on merits. General Division considered claimant’s circumstances at great length and decision was reasonable, as was Appeal Division’s decision.

Euverman v. Canada (Attorney General) (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 6630, 2017 CarswellNat 6929, 2017 FC 1054, 2017 CF 1054, Michael D. Manson J. (F.C.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Law Society Convocation approves new policy on bencher information requests

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

Most Read Articles

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala