Claimant denied CPP disability benefits based on depression caused by homophobic discrimination

Federal court | Pensions | Federal and provincial pension plans | Federal pension plans

Claimant was denied Canada Pension Plan disability benefits by General Division of Social Security Tribunal of Canada. Basis of claim was inability to work due to anxiety and depression arising from homophobic discrimination in various workplaces Application for leave to appeal refused under s. 58 of Department of Employment and Social Development Act. Claimant applied for judicial review. Application dismissed. Claimant provided no medical evidence to show 2007 doctor’s declaration that claimant able to return to regular duties was incorrect or his condition had changed. Insufficient evidence to show he was disabled in December 2008 and his employment in 2011-2012 showed he had not been continuously disabled. Recent doctor’s report stating he was incapable of working due to anxiety and depression came several years subsequent to qualifying date of December 2008 and was considered by court in refusing leave to appeal. Not role of court to re-weigh evidence and make new determination on merits. General Division considered claimant’s circumstances at great length and decision was reasonable, as was Appeal Division’s decision.

Euverman v. Canada (Attorney General) (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 6630, 2017 CarswellNat 6929, 2017 FC 1054, 2017 CF 1054, Michael D. Manson J. (F.C.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Lenczner Slaght's Susannah Alleyne talks new inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility role

Ontario court deducts COVID-19 income benefits from past income loss award in personal injury case

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results

Ontario Superior Court upholds cell phone search as lawful and rejects bid to exclude evidence

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Most Read Articles

Ontario couple can try pursuing malicious prosecution claim against McCague Borlack LLP, OCA rules

Jury award in motorcycle crash lawsuit surpasses defendant's final offer: Ontario Superior Court

Law Foundation of Ontario awards $1.5M to support access to justice for vulnerable groups

Ontario Superior Court dismisses impaired driving charges due to uncertainty in THC test results