Tax Court judge properly advising taxpayer it was not role of Tax Court to provide legal advice

Federal appeal | Tax | Income tax | Administration and enforcement

Taxpayer received nil assessments. Tax Court of Canada quashed taxpayer’s appeal because no tax, interest or penalty was assessed under federal income tax law. Taxpayer appealed. Appeal dismissed. Unless taxpayer challenged taxes, interest or penalties assessed, there was nothing to appeal. No relief could be provided from Tax Court from notification that no tax was payable, even if there may have been federal tax owing or amount was payable under provincial law. Tax Court did not breach principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, as judge properly advised taxpayer that it was not role of Tax Court to provide her with legal advice.

Segura Mosquera v. Canada (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 5272, 2018 CarswellNat 5788, 2018 FCA 170, 2018 CAF 170, D.G. Near J.A., Yves de Montigny J.A., and Judith M. Woods J.A. (F.C.A.).

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada, bows out after two decades

LSO event explores nuances of supporting human rights abroad

Report on mobile legal aid pilot program: ‘Embeddedness’ in community is key

U of T law professors auction bike tour, tarot card reading to raise funds for Indigenous initiative

Randy Williamson of Aird & Berlis named Partner of the Year by YorkU’s innovation unit

Canadian Law Awards to celebrate nation’s best law firms

Most Read Articles

Doug Ford tells judges they need to ‘toughen up’ on guns, gangs and bail

Outsized award against insurer should incentivize fairness in LAT, says lawyer

LSO diversity debate reignited after alleged conflict between equity advisor, bencher

13 in every 100,000 travellers passing the border had digital devices examined, CBSA says